Imágen de Portada

Cultural elitism, populist demagogy or aseptic technocracy? On the legitimation in the determination of local cultural heritage

The present text succintly exposes both the basis, rather theoretical and methodological, and the justification, mostly political,of a socio-anthropological research which purpose was to identify the immaterial cultural patrimony of Minas de Corrales, asmall town from the North of Uruguay. In the co...

Descripción completa

Autor Principal: Acevedo, Fernando; Universidad de la República de Uruguay
Formato: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Idioma: spa
Publicado: Instituto Carlos Arbeláez Camacho para el patrimonio arquitectónico y urbano 2014
Materias:
Cultural identity; intangible cultural heritage;cultural values, cultural, property, politics. Keywords plus: Cultural identity – Political aspects; Cultural heritage; Cultural property; Cultural values - Minas deCorrales (Uruguay).
Identidad cultural, patrimonio cultural inmaterial; valor cultural; bien cultural; política. - Descriptores: Identidad cultural – aspectos políticos; Patrimonio cultural; Bienes culturales; Valores culturales – Minas de Corrales (Uruguay)
Identidade cultural; patrimônio cultural imaterial; valor cultural; bem cultural; política; Palavras-chave descritores: Identidade cultural - Aspectos políticos; Patrimônio cultural; Bens culturais; Valoresculturais - Minas de Corrales (Uruguai).
Acceso en línea: http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revApuntesArq/article/view/8848
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Sumario: The present text succintly exposes both the basis, rather theoretical and methodological, and the justification, mostly political,of a socio-anthropological research which purpose was to identify the immaterial cultural patrimony of Minas de Corrales, asmall town from the North of Uruguay. In the course of the research some deeply problematic issues emerged. Its formulationintends to generate a debate about the conditions of the attribution of patrimonial value to certain cultural objects and itsimplications, among those interested in cultural policies and patrimonial management as well as among those who have focusedcultural identity and its collective construction from an academic approach. In this aspect two questions are particularlydifficult to elucidate: to whom rightly belongs the power to define which cultural objects possess a patrimonial value? Basedon what criteria of epistemological pertinence and social legitimation someone –any individual such as oneself– can attributeto himself the power to establish which objects possess a patrimonial value and which ones do not.

Ejemplares Similares