When the technological “transfers” “fail”. Learnings and limitations on the building of Technologies for Social Inclusion

During the past decade discussions about the way in which the development of technologies can (or should) promote social inclusion processes have been revived in the academic debate, in some cases these have also been reflected in the design and implementation of public policies. However, among the...

Descripción completa

Autor Principal: Fressoli, Mariano; Investigador CONICET / Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (IESCT-UNQ) Buenos Aires, Argentina
Otros Autores: Garrido, Santiago; Investigador CONICET / Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (IESCT-UNQ) Buenos Aires, Argentina, Picabea, Facundo; Becario posdoctoral CONICET / Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (IESCT-UNQ) Buenos Aires, Argentina, Lalouf, Alberto; Investigador del Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (IESCT-UNQ) Buenos Aires, Argentina, Fenoglio, Valeria; Becaria Doctoral CONICET / Centro de Investigaciones y Estudio sobre Cultura y Sociedad (CIECS-CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
Formato: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Idioma: spa
Publicado: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea: http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/univhumanistica/article/view/3806
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Sumario: During the past decade discussions about the way in which the development of technologies can (or should) promote social inclusion processes have been revived in the academic debate, in some cases these have also been reflected in the design and implementation of public policies. However, among the groups of R & D engaged in activities of technological development and extension the deterministic approaches and adherence to the technology transfer models persist and, therefore, they often fail to generate processes of inclusion and sustainable empowerment in the time. The main objective of this paper is to make a first analysis of the learning generated when R & D groups face problems and meanings outside their knowledge production frameworks and the way that enables new forms of negotiation of knowledge and technology, also identifying possible limitations of these processes. To this end, we analyze two experiences of developing technologies for social inclusion in Argentina in the areas of social housing and renewable energy.