Overcoming Protectionist Monopoly of Human Rights in the Mexican Constitutional State, After the Amendment to the first Article of the Constitution
This paper studies the incidence of the Constitution and internationaltreaties for the effective protection of human rights in Mexico, after theconstitutional reform of June 10th 2011 and the paradigmatic sentenceof the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation within the file varios(‘various’) 912/201...
| Autor Principal: | Flores Martínez, Alejandra; Universidad de Zaragoza, España. |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | Uribe Arzate, Enrique; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. |
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnijuri/article/view/11947 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
This paper studies the incidence of the Constitution and internationaltreaties for the effective protection of human rights in Mexico, after theconstitutional reform of June 10th 2011 and the paradigmatic sentenceof the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation within the file varios(‘various’) 912/2010. With these changes, international criteria becomean interpretive parameter that end the sole and final interpretation ofhuman rights. Based on an epistemological approach, the Mexicanconstitutional openness to the international protection of human rightsbuilds an external control and a double guarantee for such rights, whichextends beyond reductionist or unilateral criteria from the exclusive willof the State; that is to say, there is a reciprocal dialogue between domesticand international judicial bodies that seeks to overcome the protectionistmonopoly in relation to human rights in Mexico. |
|---|