Representaciones culturales de la prohibición y la legalización de las drogas vistas desde la opinión pública y marcos jurídicos
The text makes a journey through different cultural representations arising both prohibitionists as pro-legalistic, each representation described is interpreted in two voices: the public and in some cases a legal framework. The language, used to identify and evaluate the sense that each one of the p...
| Autor Principal: | Marín Restrepo, Juan Pablo |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de San Buenaventura, Cali
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
http://hdl.handle.net/10819/6808 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
The text makes a journey through different cultural representations arising both prohibitionists as pro-legalistic, each representation described is interpreted in two voices: the public and in some cases a legal framework. The language, used to identify and evaluate the sense that each one of the proposals representations; is also proposed, which are deduced the meaning of each of the embodiments described: 1) to the pro-legalistic, the president's speech of Colombia in search of a freer country and at the forefront; the reform law in Uruguay, the fight against drug trafficking; the use of coca in the Andean region; 2) and prohibitionists, religious morality, Carry A. Nation case; drug subculture, the benefits of being prohibited; Peru, an Andean region that rejects coca. The third chapter answers the above, proposing to focus his gaze on the contexts, ie each context must respond to their needs, therefore suggests that identity is respected, history and customs, however, a strong becomes stresses that there are contexts such as Latin America, the result of postcolonial processes and heavily moralized by Catholicism, which should not assume postures that is not theirs, as fashion and cultural consumption is bringing urban contexts, trends being apparently misconstrued. There and having approached by some different positions, is achieved conclude that there is a dialectical movement between individuals and context for the construction of identity, and that globalization tends to misuse of drug substances, and therefore not legalization is viable. |
|---|