The differences between legal and economic labor arbitrarion, and its impact on diffuse constitutional control
Labor Law is called to solve and prevent arisingconflicts between employers and employees. In light of this, certain conflicts between the employer and a union, or his own employees, can be solved by an arbitration board.In that line, it is important to take into account the many existing difference...
| Autor Principal: | Acevedo Mercado, Jorge Luis |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado: |
THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/10861/11366 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
Labor Law is called to solve and prevent arisingconflicts between employers and employees. In light of this, certain conflicts between the employer and a union, or his own employees, can be solved by an arbitration board.In that line, it is important to take into account the many existing differences between juridical labor arbitration and economic labor arbitration; the author, in the present article, arguments that those differences represent the fundamental reason why the first one does exercise jurisdictional function and the second one does not. On that basis, the author affirms that it’s possible to exercise diffuse control in economic labor arbitration. |
|---|