Subjectively complex part, indivisibility and annullability for relative incapacity: The darkest article of the Peruvian Civil Code also celebrates its thirtieth anniversary (and says good-bye?)
The Peruvian Civil Code commemorates its thirty years of existence. Some of its rules’content is clear, while some other rules are –in the words of the author– dark andquestionable. One of these controversial rules in its meaning and application is that contained in article 226 of the Code, related...
| Autor Principal: | León Hilario, Leysser L. |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Español |
| Publicado: |
THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/13743/14367 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
The Peruvian Civil Code commemorates its thirty years of existence. Some of its rules’content is clear, while some other rules are –in the words of the author– dark andquestionable. One of these controversial rules in its meaning and application is that contained in article 226 of the Code, relatedwith a person’s legal capacity.In this article, the author makes a historical and comparative analysis of such article, to then approach the problems contained in it, contrasting their role in the current social reality and verifying if such figure is still useful in our legal system. |
|---|