Lenguaje y realidad. Entre el monismo anómalo y la fórmula monismo = pluralismo
In this paper we propose to put in tension the approaches of Donald Davidson and Gilles Deleuze, belonging respectively to the analytical and continental philosophy. The aim is to remain in some of the tense areas arising around the question of to what extent language determines or is determined by...
| Autor Principal: | Pósleman, Cristina |
|---|---|
| Formato: | |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Instituto Riva-Agüero
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/estudiosdefilosofia/article/view/14595 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
In this paper we propose to put in tension the approaches of Donald Davidson and Gilles Deleuze, belonging respectively to the analytical and continental philosophy. The aim is to remain in some of the tense areas arising around the question of to what extent language determines or is determined by the real. We propose to consider how both authors jointly address the condition of social and creative language, and thus offer us two ways to address dualistic thinking –from Davidson’s anomalous monism and Deleuze’s monism as synonymous with pluralism– and to promote democratization of language use. Two lines which, in our perception, have not yet been sufficiently worked out regarding their deep relations. |
|---|