Between the minimization and expansion of Criminal Law: the presence of Beccaria in the contemporary debate
In the contemporary criminal law the same arguments that were manifested overtwo hundred years ago produced . What ends worth pursuing ? What should weprotect through criminal law and what should be protected by other less violentways ? What is the purpose of criminal law ? These and some other ques...
| Autor Principal: | Huertas Diaz & otros, Omar & otros |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá-Colombia
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
http://revistas.usta.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/3075 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
In the contemporary criminal law the same arguments that were manifested overtwo hundred years ago produced . What ends worth pursuing ? What should weprotect through criminal law and what should be protected by other less violentways ? What is the purpose of criminal law ? These and some other questions arethe ones who for decades have clarified the issue of crime and the offender in therule of law . In today’s society of risk it is occurring expansion of the meaning andscope of criminal law. This expansion undermines the foundations of the criminallaw claim of last resort , especially when the new model of State has exceeded therule of law , becoming a social and democratic state of law. Some of the key conceptsto achieve this minimum criminal law can be found in the work of Beccariaover two hundred years ago. |
|---|