La incongruencia entre el establecimiento de patrones de macro criminalidad y macro victimización con la parte decisoria de las sentencias de justicia y paz : análisis del caso de la condena parcial de Ramiro “Cuco” Vanoy Murillo
The Justice and Peace law adopted in Colombia with the enactment of Law 975 of 2005; It reflects the desire of the Colombian State to guarantee the rights of victims of internal armed conflict through truth, justice and reparation, all framed in due process. However, the lack of effective implementa...
| Autor Principal: | Córdoba Martínez, Juan Manuel |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de San Buenaventura - Cali
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
http://hdl.handle.net/10819/3143 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
The Justice and Peace law adopted in Colombia with the enactment of Law 975 of 2005; It reflects the desire of the Colombian State to guarantee the rights of victims of internal armed conflict through truth, justice and reparation, all framed in due process. However, the lack of effective implementation of the prioritization criteria and selection has led to justice the brink of collapse; because institutions lack legal interpretation rules for decision-making and enforcement of effective sentences. Recently the Chamber of the High Court of Justice and Peace for the Judicial District of Medellín handed down the guilty verdict partially Ramiro "Cuco" Vanoy, under the precepts of "macrocriminality" and "Macrovictimizacion"; The partial ruling handed down in this case shows clear inconsistencies between the application of these concepts with the decisional part, generated with it ordered an additional wear and particularly the judicial system of the Prosecutor General's Office. |
|---|