Propuesta de Flipped Classroom para el desarrollo de las competencias genéricas en estudiantes de ingeniería
This article discusses the importance of competencies in engineering students, defining competencies, showing their advantages, indicating their classification and, above all, describing the main generic competencies according to the National Agency for Quality Assessment and Accreditation (ANECA, f...
| Autor Principal: | Lagunes Dominguez, Agustin |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | Tafur Jiménez, Luis Alberto, Giraldo Ocampo, Julián Darío |
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Editorial Bonaventuriana
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
Lagunes Dominguez, A., Tafur Jiménez, L. A., & Giraldo Ocampo, J. D. (2017). Propuesta de Flipped Classroom para el desarrollo de las competencias genéricas en estudiantes de ingeniería. Revista de Ingenierías USBmed, 8(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.21500/20275846.2762 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
This article discusses the importance of competencies in engineering students, defining competencies, showing their advantages, indicating their classification and, above all, describing the main generic competencies according to the National Agency for Quality Assessment and Accreditation (ANECA, for its acronym in Spanish). Afterwards, the Flipped Classroom is discussed, its definition, its principles, some recommendations for its implementation and its three main advantages are described. The main contribution of this work is given by a proposal based on the Flipped Classroom, having as pillars the pre and in class activities, where these actions must have a strong connection that allows them to work in a coordinated way, integrated in a didactic strategic planning to develop competencies. The conclusions indicate that the Flipped Classroom is ideal for the development of desirable generic competencies, such as instrumental, personal and systematic. Other conclusion points out that there is no pedagogical model or didactic proposal successful that is successful without the hard work of the teacher. |
|---|