Sustentabilidad económica de la actividad lechera en la comuna Santo Domingo N°. 1. Cayambe - Ecuador 2014
The present research tried to define the full income in March, April, May, June, July and August, in 2014 getting by 6 UPAs dedicated to milk production from cows origin belonging to NUTRALAC company members, in Santo Domingo N°1 community, to be contrasted with the minimum vital salary defined b...
| Autor Principal: | Guasgua Quimblamba, Ana Lucía |
|---|---|
| Formato: | bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado: |
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/9832 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
The present research tried to define the full income in March, April, May, June, July
and August, in 2014 getting by 6 UPAs dedicated to milk production from cows
origin belonging to NUTRALAC company members, in Santo Domingo N°1
community, to be contrasted with the minimum vital salary defined by the
government in 2014 year.
This research was based in the cost production determination about a liter of milk,
taking account the following items. Prime cost (direct labor and direct prime
materials). Indirect manufacturing costs (basic services; utilities, repair and
maintenance of machinery and equipment, insurance civil engineering, machinery
and equipment, safety equipment for production, cleaning supplies, indirect materials
; depreciation of civil engineering, machinery, equipment, production tools and
biological assets) Administrative expenses (telephone and internet, office supplies,
depreciation of furniture, appliances, computer equipment and office equipment,
floor manager and leasing of land) , Selling Expenses (depreciation of the vehicle).
Reconstruction and maintenance of machinery and equipment; insurance of civil
work, machinery and equipment; security equipment for the production).
The data obtained showed that the production cost perliter of milk was higher than
these lling pricein the 6UPAs analyzed for 6 months, for this reason it was
determined with negativenet income toaverage values between-10.86and-250,38$.
At the final analysis it was determined that the item having greater participation of
the production in the cost of a liter of milk was the prime cost, with a general
average of 28%, followed by the depreciation of biological assets and salary
averaging manager general participation of 18.85% and 11.16% respectively. The
three items mentioned are not being paid by the producer, they generate "fictitious
profits", causing continueengaged in this activity, though it does not generate
positive in come. |
|---|