El lenguaje argumentativo desde la estructura cerebral :Estudio comparativo entre niños de 10-11 años y adolescentes de 14-15 años de la unidad educativa Paulo VI Quito y sus implicaciones en el aprendizaje
The first chapter is about the language, its definition, stages of development and functions. Also delves on the speech from the macro and super structure without neglecting the models. The conceptual foundations laid in the first paragraph are those that govern research. In the second chapter c...
Autor Principal: | Coyago Simbaña, Jacqueline Elizabeth |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | Quishpe Caiza, Alexis Paolo |
Formato: | bachelorThesis |
Idioma: | spa |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: |
http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/9216 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Sumario: |
The first chapter is about the language, its definition, stages of development and
functions. Also delves on the speech from the macro and super structure without
neglecting the models. The conceptual foundations laid in the first paragraph are
those that govern research.
In the second chapter considers the cortical areas related to language and the circuit
for understanding and producing the same, these categories will be of great help in
the comparative study of children and adolescents.
The third chapter is devoted to the Philosophy of Language Wittgenstein approached
from the use of language and grammar. Within this argument and argument comes
from the position of formal logic.
The previous three chapters are the conceptual and theoretical basis where the
comparative study of children and adolescents aspect that develop in the fourth and
final chapter is based. To develop the comparative study of children and adolescents
non-experimental research method and tool for gathering information is PREDI test
(procedure for evaluating the speech) is used.
Finally we proceed to perform the test PREDI with children aged 10-11 and 14-15
teenagers, and the results obtained from each group were analyzed according to
instructions and percentiles in the test established in connection with the information
the previous chapters. |
---|