Contemporary sources of thomistic political philosophy: hints of the thomistic paradigm
Referring to four contemporary Thomistic political philosophers (Copleston, Lachance, Maritain and Chalmeta)we outline the paradigm of Thomas Aquinas’ political philosophy that will serve as the basis for thedialogue with contemporary political philosophers. The sketch of the paradigm will take sha...
| Autor Principal: | CÁRDENAS SIERRA, CARLOS ALBERTO |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | GUARÍN RAMÍREZ, EDGAR ANTONIO |
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá-Colombia
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
http://revistas.usta.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/3032 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: |
Referring to four contemporary Thomistic political philosophers (Copleston, Lachance, Maritain and Chalmeta)we outline the paradigm of Thomas Aquinas’ political philosophy that will serve as the basis for thedialogue with contemporary political philosophers. The sketch of the paradigm will take shape throughthe consolidation of the investigation process, which is in its initial phase. The present article includes twoessays: The first one defines our position with regard to the distinction between political philosophy andpolitical science. This question is the epistemological key for the start of the investigation. Focusing on therelations between the concepts of the common good, the singular and the universal, the second articlediscusses three phases of contemporary political Thomism (the first three quarters of the 20th century,the last one and the current period).The above mentioned essays belong to the context of discovery introduced by Reichenbach in Experienceand Prediction (1938). In the referred context of science, the investigation is in the following phase: search,collection of information and organization of data. |
|---|